The Gospel, "To The Letter, Without Gloss" - Fridays With Francis

When I consider St. Francis, I am continually amazed at the incredible impact he has had (and still has) on the lives of people, both Christian and otherwise. Though we can point to his excesses (like his refusal to have any of his followers even touch money or extreme self-impoverishment after the supposed example of Jesus), we must stop to consider why he is widely embraced and is the subject of more books and biographies than any other saint in history (a point made more interesting we recognize that he is also one of the least educated of saints).
St. Francis of Assisi distinguished himself most by his unwavering and unnuanced adherence to the Gospel of Jesus Christ. For him, this was summed up best in the Sermon on the Mount, which he followed as though it were written specifically for him to follow as literally as possible. Again, in the midst of this radical obedience, it is very easy to see his extremes and even mistakes. However, what cannot be denied is the power and impact that his obedience had on his time and all times since.
It begs the question, then, why do we not abandon ourselves to this kind of reckless faithfulness to the Gospel? Surely the extremes and mistakes we will most certainly make (no greater than the ones we already make) are a small price to pay in our lives can so powerfully incarnate the love and presence of Christ before a waiting and watching world. What if we, as communities and individuals, seriously endeavoured to follow the Sermon on the Mount literally, even for only a season?
Of course, my own mind immediate starts asking the question: But what does the Sermon of the Mount actually call us to? What does it mean? Are there not many interpretations? Of course there is legitimacy to some of these question, but St. Francis had little patience for interpretations. As one his biographers, Leonardo Boff, puts it:
"He knew very well that for the most part the interpretations are but a castration of the strength of the Gospel, and the Gospel was, simply, for him, his formula vitae."
I am deeply challenged by St. Francis example. To that end I have been examining my own life against the measure of the Gospel and the Sermon on the Mount, and I am shamed by my inadequacy. However, St. Francis also embodies something unlike so many of the leaders of the monastic movements, his devotion was matched only by his joy and grace. And so my shame is transformed into hope, excitement and even anticipation.
I do not make this journey lightly, for as I consider the implication of this calling, I know that will inevitably (even essentially) be disruptive. The people in my life- family, friends and neighbours- cannot avoid being impacted by the direction I am moving in. I am grateful, however, that I am not making this journey alone. I am part of a community that longs for this kind of life together, people who inspire me daily. People like my co-workers. Most of all, people like my wife.
This is the foundation on which I long to build our "church plant" (an inadequate designation, but it will suffice). I have been in ministry long enough, lived in community long enough and have called the inner city my home long enough not to be blinded by idealism. Rather, like St. Francis, I want to carry my idealism into the midst of the very real brokenness of our lives and our world, and with joy, allow Christ to transform us together.
St. Francis Franciscan Missional Sermon On The Mount Jesus





(Comment this)
Great questions, though I am not sure there is space enough here to even brush the surface. Let try to give a few points. This obedience is characterized by a passionate pursuit of imitation of Christ, both individually and communally. It leads to a commitment to community that stands in stark contrast to the individualism of the day, impact more than just our personal, moral formation, but touching on every aspect (i.e. how/where we live, how we spend our money, generosity/hospitality, etc.).
In inspires a trust in God that is reflected in a peace in the midst of real sacrifice for others, walking out the nitty-gritty of Christ's teaching/example. In an age where violence is so common, they are people who not only resist and detest this state of being, but proactively go out to make peace, especially with ones enemies. It MUST be expressed through consistent, costly and relationally motivated service to other, especially the "least of these", not out of paternalistic superiority, but out of a humbled pursuit of Christ in the other, a mutual need for neighbour. A humble, but shameless representation of the Gospel, made manifest in our own lives first so that the words (which MUST be proclaimed) are not made empty by our hypocrisy.
For me (or rather for our little community) it is leading to more intentional community, sharing life together in ways that impact everything from economics to socialization. We are making the shift from beliefs and values to virtues and practices (not that the former aren't important, but too often remain ideas). We are trying to spend our energy in knowing, serving and loving our neighbours, not primarily through programs, but by being just that, their neighbours. Again, this only brushes the surface.
Who is already living this way? The people who inspire me most tend to be those whose calling/context are similar to ours, so I want to me it clear that I don't believe everyone is meant to be inner city intentional missional communities among the poor. However, the Rutba House community, the Simple Way, Missio Dei in MN, JPUSA and others inspire us daily. I am also deeply inspired and challenged by the selfless obedience of the Chinese underground church, though (sadly) they are increasingly feeling as though they need to be more like us, when we have SO much more to learn from their radical obedeince.
Ok, that is a blog post in itself! Hope it helped.
Peace,
Jamie (Comment this)
(Comment this)
http://www.marshillchurch.org/content/esv
I don't know anything about the ESV so can't comment on their decision but it does open the question of if you are determined to be radically obedient to the words of Christ - are you sure you've got the words right?
(Comment this)
Peace,
Jamie (Comment this)
Interesting, though Francis (of course) was not referring to Bible translations, as there weren't options in his day. I think he was more concerned with endless debate about meaning that robbed us of time and energy to BE Christ in the world. He didn't reject the need for understanding, but recognized it as an all too common excuse to not act.
I appreciate Mark Driscoll in many ways, but I am not sure that I would have as much confidence in a particular version to solve as many of the issues as it seems to suggest. Thanks!
Peace,
Jamie (Comment this)